|
You COULD try driving it BACKWARDS. The increase in weight
transfer to the braking wheels is dramatic. <G> [BTW, enough
velocity will result in lifting the front wheels AND the mower deck
from the ground. }The root problem isn't braking effectiveness, it's
just plain physics.On a downhill run, ANY rear wheel braking system is
in trouble. It CAN'T be avoided. RJ Pieter Litchfield wrote: One of the "problems" with my E-12 and E-15 tractors is that the disk brake is attached to the transmission input shaft. As such, it is on the engine side of the transmission wheel differential. Locking a well adjusted brake is quite possible. However, you are only locking 1 rear wheel in doing so, and that would be the wheel with less traction. I can't tell you how many 1 wheel skid marks I have left down damp grassy slopes around my house with the brake working as good as or better than factory fresh. I'd love to have brakes on BOTH rear wheels, especially if I could use independent braking to assist turning or for traction control when spinning under power. By the way, if you leave it in a low gear and DONT touch the brake pedal going down hill, dynamic braking by the motor is as useful as the brake pedal. But my main point here is that you can't put a dress on a pig. The E braking system can't be "fixed" to produce dramatic stops because of the way in which it was engineered to begin with. On 3/23/2009 1:33 PM, Christopher Zach wrote: |